8/5/2023 0 Comments News source infographicThis is another tell that the article you’re reading is providing suspect information. Advising readers to “do their own research.” Or at least read it with the knowledge that you’re not getting all the facts. If you want to remain as unbiased a consumer of news as possible, avoid publications that include this kind of shouty, inflammatory rhetoric. This type of language appears in media on each of the far sides of the political spectrum, so don’t assume your “side” is immune. Headlines with provocative adjectives and verbs like “RADICAL,” “DESTROY,” and “HUMILIATE” are a sign that the publication you are reading is extremely biased-whether it’s biased toward the left or to the right. Incendiary language is the most obvious sign that an article or publication is biased. Use of incendiary language, especially when coupled with caps. So let’s talk about four ways to quickly identify biased reporting without consulting an infographic. If you get familiar with what these clues are, you’ll be able to quickly tell whether the publication you’re reading can be taken at face value, or whether you need to dig deeper for a more accurate account of the story-regardless of what you’re reading. Every unreliable or untrue story has clues laced throughout its text that reveal its bias. You know how, in poker, if you study the facial expressions and body language of the other players, you eventually begin to pick up “tells” that clue you in to the kind of hand they have? Well, news publications have “tells” too. But there are other ways to tell if a text you’re reading is biased. I have found the graphic above to be accurate as far as its assessment of which news publications are the most neutral and thoroughly reported. But if a person can’t even trust the fact checkers, how can they possibly determine what’s real and what is “fake news”? High schoolers and college students are taught to “consider the source,” but what happens when the sources you have always considered reliable are now called into question? Where do you turn? The interesting thing that has been happening lately, though, is that an entire alternate reality has come gurgling to the forefront-a reality that says that the fact checkers and media bias analysis sites are themselves biased. As maligned as Wikipedia is for being unreliable due to its public editability, this page in particular is remarkably reliable and commonly used as a source guide for publications looking to cite other publications as sources as they report on related stories. Wikipedia also has an excellent article that details an alphabetical list of publications and rates them according to reliability.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |